logo robot che pettina donna per open moneta viva orG e moneta viva supeR

viva supeR

The money of tomorrow is wondrous

social
dividenD
and tax abolition

living money supeR is special because it wears out or decays1 every year and with each exchange. This creates revenue available for public spending and the social dividenD, enough to abolish taxes and much more.

Automatic fiscal pressure

supeR tames all taxes and confines them to a single monetary rate that produces automatic revenue sufficient to fund public spending2.

to abolish taxes a social dividenD is needed

Low incomes are compensated by excessive fiscal pressure but only up to a threshold. Beyond that, the pressure becomes positive, remaining overall progressive. All automatic and anonymous, with striking consequences.

supeR also abolishes income tax returns!

If public spending is financed and taxation is progressive, and if the mechanism is anonymous, income declarations can be abolished while respecting constitutions requiring tax progressivity.

However, exceptions are not excluded

For astronomical or galactic incomes or any ceiling established, supeR preserves and respects all democratic prerogatives.

why not UBI instead of social dividenD?

UBI* is used with Living Money, while supeR has a different structure.
*Universal Basic Income.

what makes supeR special compared to simple vivA

supeR considers every citizen in a democracy as a shareholder of the national megagiga corporatioN, holding one inalienable share. on their behalf, the megagigA issues new supeR to finance public spending and assign dividends.

what justifies the social dividenD?

Citizen-shareholders claim the right to participate in the profits generated in their market. If private shareholders may enrich themselves without limit and only contribute to expenses, the same cannot apply to societies that are not shareholders.

So much innovation would shake the economy

Instead, a phased transition is planned, introducing successive functions until reaching equilibrium where the system operates steadily. The transition is gradual and reversible if results are not achieved.

Too simple, something must be wrong, who did the math?

Exact figures are impossible, probable ones indicate a rate between 8% and 16%. the margin depends on the lack of data on living currency circulation and the enormous scale in trillions compared to the empty coffers of the lab from which supeR originates.

There is not only the fiscal question

supeR can be configured to respond to all modern challenges and those yet to come.

What happens to savings? they’re not protected

on the contrary, supeR reduces the rate for unspent money over the years, down to a minimum, even savings protection becomes automatic without citizen intervention.

And what answers does supeR give to automation?

supeR redistributes part of the profits generated by machines and robots, and whenever a robot takes a human’s job, it compensates them and gives back free time, or better, allows working hours to be reduced.

The risk that someone owns everything can never be excluded

supeR is also security that no one will ever be able to own everything while others have nothing, because there will always be public spending financed and decided by the population, and the social dividenD will always be assigned.

supeR can do nothing for pensions

on the contrary, supeR includes universal senior pensions and the abolition of contribution obligations.

Nice idea, but who pays the pensions?

They would be covered by global wealth, including speculative capital that contributes nothing to pension systems, at the cost of a slight increase in the monetary rate.

supeR cannot do anything about public debt

There will be no further need to resort to debt to finance public spending, and its reduction will be planned.

supeR is unsuitable for foreign trade

Indeed, it is paired with a complementary living currency designed for international trade and stock exchange operations.

Why hasn’t anyone thought of it before?

In fact, a similar model was proposed about a century ago by Silvio Gesell, who designed a currency with “demurrage”. It was tested locally and successfully.

The system is clearly politically unbalanced

public spending and the social dividenD are adjustable, the rate depends on them. Within the same system, many political orientations can coexist, competing for votes through different proposals on the available levers.

And what happens to meritocracy?

Meritocracy stays, except that every private gain now brings an automatic public one.

So this money would have no flaws?

the main flaw is the authoR developing many projects independently and without funding, to the point of relying on public support.


1The currency is digital, and each year its value decays according to the established rate of wear. the same happens with every account transfer. for example, a coin worth 12 supeR could buy goods worth up to 11 supeR, with 1 as transaction cost. if not spent, after one year it would be worth 11 supeR.

2The rate on the currency causes a loss of circulating value that must be reintegrated by new issuance. adjusting the rate provides enough revenue to finance public spending.


the living money supeR theory currently exists as several chapters, while the Theory of Living Money is already published both on the site and on Zenodo; that version is now considered outdated.

What you'll find on the site

The site is incomplete yet operational
mostly still unpunctuated
in the style called *svirgolato*
as in this paragraph

Later, traditional punctuation began to be used again, combined with the final super capital style, explained somewhere, but not here.

living money supeR is only one among several living currencies, and these belong to many theories and projects, some even reach the hard sciences with related experiments.

this shows that the open moneta viva orG laboratory-company is active in many directions, and thus supeR has to compete for attention. That's why the company is open to collaborations: just interact with the site to begin.

the site is divided into two main sections: stamperY and blacksmitH. The first deals mainly with living currencies and economics, the second with everything else.

Curtain was meant to serve as a front screen for a site under construction, but it will likely remain permanent, hosting notes and reflections.

According to the company’s policy, no good interaction will go unrewarded.